AI Trademark Israel : Navigating Artificial Intelligence
Introduction
The Rise of AI Trademark Israel Challenges
Addressing AI-Generated Infringement
Future-Proofing Your Digital IP Strategy
In many jurisdictions, including Israel, the law attempts to balance free trade with intellectual property rights. Because parallel imports involve genuine goods rather than counterfeits, standard infringement claims are not always straightforward. Brand owners must navigate a nuanced legal landscape to determine when an unauthorized import crosses the line into trademark infringement or passing off.
For international brands expanding their global footprint, securing trademarks in Israel is a critical step. With a robust economy and a highly active consumer market, Israel presents immense opportunities, but it also carries risks if your intellectual property is left unprotected. At Yossi Sivan Law Firm, managing trademark portfolios for international and local brands is one of our core specialties. We understand that foreign businesses require strategic intelligence to safeguard their assets.
Registering your trademark prevents unauthorized third parties from capitalizing on your brand’s reputation. When filing for trademarks in Israel, foreign entities must choose the right strategy. You can opt for a National Registration directly through the Israel Trademark and Patent Office or an International Registration via the Madrid System.
Understanding the difference between national registration and international registration of trademarks is crucial for a cost-effective global strategy. Failing to properly register can lead to severe consequences, including the potential to lose your rights in the local market.
Foreign businesses require more than just a basic filing service; they need comprehensive trademark intelligence. Our firm is highly specialized in acting for international brands and managing complex intellectual property disputes. We ensure your brand is protected through:
Combatting Local Infringement Once registered, vigilance is key. Understanding trademark infringement in Israel is essential as a guide for international brands. We actively monitor local markets and pursue litigation aggressively if we detect counterfeit goods or passing off.
Contact the Experts If you are an international business looking to secure your trademarks in Israel, partner with a firm that strives to achieve the highest legal standards. Contact Yossi Sivan Law Firm at our Rehovot office by calling 972-8-6197090, or email us at yossi@sivan-law.com to discuss your global IP strategy today.
A ground breaking Trademark Infringement Award in Israel. In a significant development for intellectual property rights in Israel, the Supreme Court has denied the appeal filed by Rami Levi Shikma Marketing 2006 Ltd. and Yafiz Fashion Ltd.
In this decision, the Supreme Court is affirming one of the largest trademark infringement awards ever granted in the country (following the withdrwal of the appeal by the defandnats).
As previously reported, the Tel Aviv District Court delivered a trailblazing Trademark Infringement Award in April 2023, ordering Rami Levi and Yafiz Fashion to pay over 3 million₪ (including 2,413,836₪ plus interest and expenses) to Lifestyle Equities C.V. and Lifestyle Licensing B.V., the owners of the Beverly Hills Polo Club (BHPC) brand, for unauthorized sales of branded products.
The plaintiffs were representing by Yossi Sivan Law Firm.
This judgment was notable for several reasons:
Record Compensation: The Trademark Infringement Award is among the highest ever seen in Israel for a trademark infringement case, calculated based on the defendants’ actual gross profit instead of estimated damages or reasonable royalties.
Third-Party Liability: For the first time, a commercial distributor was held responsible even when it did not directly manufacture the infringing goods, establishing that retailers cannot shield themselves from liability by relying solely on their suppliers.
Enforcement of Licensing Restrictions: The court enforced restrictions limiting distribution to specific retail channels, confirming that licensees and third parties must respect such restrictions when notified.
Following the District Court’s decision, Rami Levi and Yafiz filed an appeal to the Israeli Supreme Court. The Supreme Court has now rejected their appeal, cementing the lower court’s judgment and its legal precedents.
This outcome is a phenomenal achievement for brand owners in Israel. The Supreme Court’s decision unequivocally reinforces trademark protections and demonstrates the judiciary’s willingness to uphold substantial remedies, including disgorgement of unlawful profits, in favor of rights holders.
It sends a clear message: brand owners can successfully pursue meaningful enforcement, and commercial distributors must take intellectual property compliance seriously.
This decision stands as a milestone for the protection of international brands in Israel’s market and sets an important precedent for future trademark enforcement actions.
Dislcaimer: Please be aware that the information provided in this article is intended for general informational purposes only and should not be considered legal advice. For specific legal matters, it is recommended to consult with a licensed attorney.
Internet LawDomain name theft is a growing concern for businesses in Israel. This article explores the phenomenon, prevention strategies, and legal processes for recovering stolen domain names, with a focus on the unique Israeli context.
Domain name theft occurs when a malicious actor gains unauthorized access to a domain name registration account and transfers the domain to another registrar without the owner’s consent. This can have severe consequences for businesses, including loss of online presence, reputation damage, and potential revenue loss.
To protect your domain from theft:
– Use strong, unique passwords for your domain registrar account
– Enable two-factor authentication
– Keep contact information up-to-date
– Use domain locking features provided by your registrar
Registering your domain name as a trademark in Israel provides an additional layer of protection. In Israel, trademark registration is handled by the Israel Patent Office. A registered trademark:
– Grants exclusive rights to use the mark
– Strengthens your legal position in domain disputes
– Can be used as evidence of ownership in legal proceedings
If your domain name is stolen, act quickly to recover it:
1. Contact your domain registrar immediately
2. File a complaint with the relevant authorities
3. Consider legal action or alternative dispute resolution
The Israel Internet Association (ISOC-IL) offers the IL-DRP (Israeli Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy) for resolving domain disputes. This process is relevant for .il domain names and is often faster and less expensive than court proceedings.
To initiate an IL-DRP procedure:
1. File a petition with ISOC-IL (appeal@isoc.org.il)
2. Demonstrate that:
– The domain is identical or confusingly similar to your trademark
– You have rights to the name
– The current holder has no rights to the name
– The domain was registered or used in bad faith
3. Pay the required fees
4. Wait for the panel’s decision
During the IL-DRP process, the domain’s registration status is frozen.
The Uniform Domain-Name Dispute-Resolution Policy (UDRP) is relevant for generic top-level domains (gTLDs) like .com, .net, and .org. While not specific to Israel, it can be used by Israeli businesses for international domain disputes.
When alternative dispute resolution is insufficient, you may need to pursue legal action in Israeli courts to return your domain name. This is particularly relevant for complex cases or when seeking damages.
– Use IL-DRP for .il domains and straightforward cases
– Consider UDRP for international domains
– Opt for court proceedings in complex cases or when seeking damages
When recovering or choosing a new domain name, consider these SEO-friendly strategies:
– Include relevant keywords in your domain name
– Keep the domain short and memorable
– Use hyphens sparingly
– Choose a .co.il extension for local Israeli businesses
Domain name theft is a serious threat to businesses in Israel. By implementing strong prevention measures, understanding the legal processes available, and acting quickly in case of theft, you can protect your online presence and recover stolen domains effectively.
Remember, registering your domain as a trademark provides an additional layer of protection and strengthens your position in disputes. Whether you choose the IL-DRP process, UDRP, or court proceedings, act swiftly to protect your digital assets and maintain your online presence.
In the colorful landscape of the 1980s, when neon colors adorned the streets and synth-pop music filled nightclubs, many remember one vehicle that became an iconic symbol of the era: the legendary Vespa. A mere glance from afar was enough to recognize a Vespa. Its groundbreaking design, the rounded belly falling beneath the driver’s seat, and the rear that cleverly concealed the back wheel, like an artistic object telling the story of the time, were all symbols of Vespa’s uncompromising identity, making it one of the most popular vehicles.
Its round lines, chrome finish, and vibrant paint jobs reflected the enthusiasm and optimism of the era. Whether it was the red Vespa speeding by or the black Vespa with heavy rock decorations, each scooter told a different story, reflecting the personality and spirit of its rider. In every corner of the city, you could feel the noisy exhaust of the Vespa, as if the engine was demonstrating its love for everyone singing the famous pop songs of the time.

And the sound, how can we forget that sound? As if small stones were clattering inside the exhaust like popcorn in the exhaust pipe, creating a unique sound recognizable from afar that was associated only with the Vespa.
Riding a Vespa became a symbol of self-discovery, spirit, and the experience of true freedom that spread to every corner of the popular culture of that era. Riding a Vespa meant breaking away from traditional norms, embracing the spirit of adventure, and exploring the world independently. Thanks to its unique design, the Vespa became a true cultural motor phenomenon. When the adventurous riders got married and started families, they attached a funny little container on wheels with a seat and a windshield, turning the Vespa into a hybrid motorcycle for two, one next to the other, which they called the Vespa with a sidecar.
In Israel, two main models were imported, PX150 and PX200, with the difference being in the engine size and declared power – 9 HP for the 150 version versus 12 HP for the 200 version, with a maximum speed of around 90-100 km/h.
Almost forty years later, the Vespa brand is still alive and kicking, mainly in Italy. In Israel, however, you can hardly find any Vespas on the roads except for collector’s items and museums.
Recently, there has been a massive wave of motor nostalgia, with scooter manufacturers trying to revive the old success wave of the Vespa by designing their scooters similar to the original Vespa design. Vespa did not like this and began taking legal action against the Chinese company manufacturing these scooters.
During the legal discussions, the question arose whether Piaggio, the rights owner of the Vespa brand, is entitled to exclusivity on its unique design despite it being an old model produced decades ago, thereby preventing Chinese competitors from marketing various Vespa look-alikes. Additionally, the question arose whether car manufacturers are entitled to exclusivity on their vehicle designs.

The legal battle that began in 2017 recently ended with a resounding victory for Piaggio, the owner of the Vespa brand. The Italian court ruled that the external design of the Vespa has “artistic value” that far outweighs the technical and functional nature of the design and is therefore protected by copyright. This ruling means that manufacturing scooters whose external design is similar to the original Vespa design in Italy constitutes copyright infringement and is therefore prohibited.
Interestingly, this ruling contradicts another ruling by the Italian court in the case of Alfa Romeo and Lancia given about three years ago. Alfa Romeo is known for its fast sports cars, but more than anything it is known for the unique designs of its vehicles, evoking feelings of speed, status, and success. One of the most beautiful Alfa Romeo models is the Alfa Romeo Giulietta, produced from the 1950s in various versions. Anyone who grew up in the 1980s surely remembers this car and the looks it drew as it scorched the road with its amazing engine sound.

Recently, an interesting legal question arose in the Italian court – is the beauty and unique history of a vehicle a justification to grant it copyright protection?
The story began when a company manufacturing toy car models started marketing the Alfa Romeo Giulietta model without receiving permission from Alfa Romeo. Alfa Romeo filed a lawsuit in court, requesting an injunction to prevent the toy company from marketing these models, claiming that the toy models infringe on Alfa Romeo’s copyright on its original design.
This claim was rejected by the Turin court, which refused to grant any copyright protection to the vehicle designs. The court ruled that an industrial design intended for mass production may be protected by copyright if it has some “artistic value” that can be inferred from cultural recognition, museum displays, design awards, design by a famous artist, and a price far above the market price.
The court reviewed these conditions and ruled that the Alfa Romeo Giulietta design did not meet them, as the Giulietta model’s design did not meet the requirement of “artistic value” and did not provide added value to the design beyond the functionality inherent in similar vehicles from the same category. Additionally, it was determined that the designers of the models (the lawsuit was also filed regarding Lancia models) were talented designers but were not “artists” by profession, and therefore their work is not considered “artistic creation.”
But if we are talking about art, why is the legendary Vespa entitled to copyright protection while the Alfa Romeo Giulietta model is not? In my opinion, the external design of the Alfa Giulietta, reflecting style, sport, and motor art that no longer exists, has much higher artistic value than the Vespa. It seems that in this unique field, the last word has yet to be said, and it is likely that car manufacturers will continue to fight for the exclusivity of their designs, even for old models that are no longer in production.
The author is a lawyer specializing in intellectual property and brand protection.
The Hebrew version of this article was published in the Israeli car magazine Queen of the Road
Disclaimer: The information provided on this website is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The content on this site should not be relied upon or used as a substitute for consultation with professional legal advisors.
